Responding to Groupthink and Faulty Reasoning at NASA Case Study - 6

Responding to Groupthink and Faulty Reasoning at NASA - Case Study Example From this paper it is clear that if group members have doubts but lack appropriate evidence to support their position, their doubts and concerns should still be communicated to authorized personnel who have the competencies and qualifications to evaluate the matter and substantiate whether there are valid support for the doubts. The important thing is that the concern has been effectively communicated and relayed to higher authorities.  The reporter stresses   "if I were head of NASA, I would have launched a rescue shuttle in as far as I am confident that the second shuttle would not meet the same fatal accident regarding the first foam strike that happened with Columbia. I would also solicit as much information as evidently possible to determine alternative courses of action where the Columbia crew could make it back to Earth as innovatively possible.   As indicated, NASA has followed these steps to change its culture and to resist groupthink: safety worries are encouraged to be communicated and are not out rightly dismissed; teams of engineers conduct simulations on diverse scenarios to assist in addressing problems and concerns; cross-checking of interventions, suggestions and recommendations from one team of engineers are validated by another group of engineers from a different research center to avoid group think and to encourage taking diverse perspectives; worst case scenarios are proactively established including establishment of contingency plans in these situations. If these changes and activities are continued to encourage innovative thinking, the agency could indeed continue with its progress. Progress could be slow at first but it is always better to be slow than sorry. "

Final paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 6

Final paper - Essay Example The films also include a savior, or police officer with a conscience and who is incorruptible. Family, brotherhood, and loyalty are the typical themes of most John Woo films. Heroic bloodshed movies tend to have strong emotional angles, not only in between the story, but also during action sequences. Pistols and submachine guns are frequently used by the heroes due to their light weight, which enables them to move quickly. The characters are extremely agile and implement dives, slides, falls, and rolls while they duel, making it a ballet-like performance in the midst of a gunfire. John Woo’s A Better Tomorrow came later in the list of Hong Kong movies I have viewed. It was an exciting experience to watch it for the first time. A Better Tomorrow was a 1986 mega box-office film in Asia. The film contains Woo’s signature style of violence, emotional tension and male bonding. The film focuses mainly on the bond between two main characters, and brings about the Asian traditional themes of loyalty and brotherhood. A Better Tomorrow depicts the activities of the Hong Kong criminal world, involving ‘brother Mark, the main characters best friend whose exuberance, loyalty, and style that spawned a whole generation imitators in film works, among them, Quentin Tarantino. This film won the Best Picture and the Best Actor Awards in the 1987 Hong Kong Academy Awards. At its commence, Mark, the character played by Chow Yun Fat’s strikes me as charismatic, with a style that is appealing. The viewer is introduced to him chewing a toothpick while ordering food before he meets Ho, played by Tung-Li. Almost instantly the viewer sees the relationship between Ho and Mark; friendly and playful. The sense of family and comradeship is already established within the first 5 minutes. Mark has a warm, trusting appearance from which his charisma shines. Equitably, Ho has such character and expression on his face. Later in the film, Ho’s brother Kit discovers